DIGITAL TO ANALOG CONVERSION, getting the bits to my speakers
Banner

Archive for January, 2010

Day 12. Waiting, waiting … then Louis Prima.

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

After letting the backup run overnight two nights ago (then into the day yesterday, then into last night) I finally got to pull the Capitol Series collection of Louis Prima (with lots of Keely Smith and Sam Butera as well!) onto the computer.

I get my love for Louis Prima from my grandfather. He told me as a kid that while most Italians listen to Frank Sinatra, all REAL Italians listen to Louis Prima. My grandpa was also on a quest for a live album of Louis Prima live in Lake Tahoe that featured a performance of Tony Bennet’s ‘I Left My Heart In San Francisco’ that wasn’t really sung, but was spoken in a thick Italian accent with confused lyrics. And I think a performance like that really shows the difference between Ol’ Blue Eyes and The Lip… there was always a deep sense of humor that Prima brought to his show. Actually – Prima saw his performances (even on disc) as a show, filled with humor and sight-gags in addition to some great playing. The sight-gags often included Prima’s ‘straight-man’ (and wife) Keely Smith, or him and Sam Butera (his long time saxophone player) battling it out with musical jabs.

The ‘Capitol Collector’s Series’ disc is a great one disc set of studio recordings mostly made in the 50s and 60s. There are songs about Sputnik. There are a number of standards that turn into the signature Prima Jumpin’ Jive (‘Lazy River’, ‘I’ve Got The World On A String’), remakes of some Prima standards from his earlier days as a swing band leader (most notable ‘Sing Sing Sing (With A Swing)’) and some early mash-ups (‘Just A Gigolo / I Ain’t Got Nobody’ and ‘Angelina / Zooma Zooma’).

When Tamiko and I would throw dinner parties in our older apartment living days, I would throw Louis Prima on if we were making Italian food … while the red sauce was simmering and the bottle of wine had already been opened. And I finally did find a disc of the live Tahoe show for my grandpa… it was a riot to hear, and he had the biggest smile on his face while listening to ‘I Left My Heart In San Francisco’. I could tell he was remembering the performances he saw back in the 60s. Just hearing it was lots of fun for me… I can’t imagine what it would have been like to see this group play live.

Day 11. Nina Simone.

Saturday, January 30th, 2010


The first time I heard Nina Simone was a late night at the Tower Records in Berkeley (while shelving some discs). The song was ‘Sinnerman’, and when I heard her voice I had to find out who it was singing. And as the song builds up, the piano playing becomes manic… frantic… and I had to figure out who was playing piano. And it was still Nina Simone! Then the clapping begins, some vocal utterances, and the piano puts a simple melody over the top of it. And then it brings the rest of the band back in. Nina sings out an ‘Oh yeah!’. Then everything picks up again. The energy in this performance is simply amazing.

I picked up a single greatest hits disc on Philips records that night that had ‘Sinnerman’ on it, and was amazed by the whole disc. From the vocal standard styling on ‘I Loves You Porgy’ to the driving and tight flute and drums of ‘See-Line Woman’. ‘Pirate Jenny’, ‘Four Women’ and ‘Mississippi Goddam’. The variety and breadth of her performances on this single disc stunned me.

The discs tonight are that ‘Best of’ disc and the ‘Four Women’ box set of her Philips releases. Where the ‘Best of’ collection contains mostly serious and dark songs, I was surprised to hear how much humor Nina Simone also had at times. In ‘Go Limp’ she leads the audience in what she calls a ‘hootenanny time’ sing-along… mostly a drunken waltz that sets women’s rights and the civil rights movement against the story of a mother telling her daughter how to snag a man. It is a drunken waltz that lets her vamp as she laughs at the song, and criticizes her audience for not singing along as loud as they should. The song is also filled with a number of pregnant pauses while she waits for the audience to get the jokes that are in the song’s lyrics.

‘Love Me Or Leave Me’ shows off her classical training (with some wonderful imitative playing in the middle of the song) and ‘Nobody Knows You When You’re Down And Out’ shows how bluesy she could get.

A couple years after Tamiko and I moved to Seattle, Nina Simone played a concert at the Seattle Symphony’s Benaroya Hall. She was making a rare appearance in the States (she had moved to Paris decades before after deciding that she couldn’t live in the U.S. anymore since she would always be treated as a second-class citizen because of the color of her skin), and I know I should have found some way to get tickets. They were well outside our graduate student budget but I should have realized that this was surely the last chance we would have to see her perform live. The reviews talked about how stunning the performance was. She passed away two years later. I regret not seeing James Brown before he died. I regret skipping on Elvin Jones thinking I’d catch him the next time around. But missing Nina Simone will probably be one of my biggest concert regrets for some time.

UPDATE: the backup is STILL running… guess this one isn’t going to get ripped until tomorrow.

Back-ups, and consolidating libraries.

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Having a good back-up of everything is a pretty important part of the project. I finally picked up a 1 TB hard drive today and started to back up the library, but discovered a couple of problems that I had to solve first.

A few days ago, I started to also put mp3 downloads from eMusic onto the main computer (which is how I have been buying my music for the past year and a half). I had two drives hooked up (a 80 GB and a 250GB drive) and I decided to put the mp3s onto the smaller drive since I wasn’t sure when I would be getting the larger drive that the project will be needing. So when I got the new drive today, I realized that I should just put the whole library in one place (the 250 GB drive). Of course – I then realized that moving all the mp3s would mess up the links in the iTunes library! Luckily iTunes has a way to deal with this.

There is a function called ‘Consolidate Library’ that will copy all your files to a central location. Worked like a charm, and I had the new drive plugged in pretty quick. Then I had to decide how to deal with the backups themselves. TimeMachine (in OS X 10.5 and later) is good for making an archived clone of your system, but I am really only concerned about backing up the soundfiles. So I checkout out Carbon Copy Cloner first.

The clone went quick. Too quick. When I looked at the back-up, there was a problem with permissions and most of the data was not backed up. A couple Google searches didn’t really reveal anything so I thought about using rsync (which I use for a couple of coding projects I maintain). The nice thing about rsync is that only changed files are backed up, so backups should go faster. I decided to use a GUI program called arSync (with a pirate icon) to run things and it is working well so far. But the initial backup is over 40 GBs, and rsync needs to also keep a log of what is backed up (as well as checksums and the last time a file is opened / altered).

The initial backup is taking a loooooong time. But after the first, things should go faster. But until it is done, I’m probably not going to rip any discs…

Day 10. Stuart Dempster, Os Mutantes and Mozart.

Friday, January 29th, 2010

Today’s discs are Stuart Dempster’s ‘Underground Overlays From The Cistern Chapel’, The Best of Os Mutantes and period instrument recordings of Mozart’s last four string quartets and late piano quartets.

I consider myself EXTREMELY lucky to know Stuart. He is quite possibly the most amazing musician I have ever had the chance to talk, listen to and learn from (though I don’t know how much Stuart knows this… so, just in case he is reading – Thanks Stuart!).

The ‘Cistern Chapel’ disc features Stuart and a number of musicians (including my friend Chad Kirby) that he taught and worked with in the Pacific Northwest recorded inside a huge underground water tank in Fort Warden, Washington. Every sound that is made in the cistern will echo for 35-45 seconds. The music on this disc includes trombones, didgeridoo, conch shells and voice. As every new sound is created, it is sustained as new material begins. The performers play the space in addition to their instruments. I find it strange now to say something like ‘the performers play the space in addition to their instruments’ since after hearing this disc, one of my big realizations as a musician is that a performer is ALWAYS playing the space in addition to their instruments. I remember how I would always have to make adjustments during performances once an audience was present or to adjust to a new space, but until I heard this disc is was something I did subconsciously, and certainly not something that I would have realized that I could play with. And it is still one of the biggest concerns (and joys) I have when performing electronic music.

I also have a string of pieces that were heavily influenced by the music on this disc. ‘Palimpsest’ for electric guitar was my first attempt to think of reverb and space as a compositional parameter and not just an effect. ‘Cadence’ for computer has the decay of sound (over 14 minutes) as it’s main concept. ‘Theta’ for viola is largely about making the performer resonate with themselves. And finally ‘Risonanza’ for computer, which was composed for the High Voltage Hall in Warsaw, Poland last year. The High Voltage Hall was a large, metallic cube that had a 30 second reverb time, and the piece was conceived for performance in that space and its unique qualities. ‘Space’ as a compositional concept, something to be shaped and controlled like melody or harmony, has become one of the most important aspects to my music. And it was Stuart’s disc that revealed the possibilities of musical space to me. This became one of my main topics of research for my doctoral exams, and it is still one of the most important areas of my work.

The music on ‘Cistern Chapel’ is often described as ambient, and I certainly understand this description. But what strikes me most about the disc is how much attention it draws from me when I listen to it. One might expect that once a sound plays and begins a 40 second decay, that there isn’t much more to hear beyond the space. But what you hear is how complex sound is and how timbre changes as energy dissipates. The result is a very dynamic and active music, constantly changing in ways that ‘more active’ music doesn’t. In most classical / pop music, there may be 1-5 notes of melody per second and harmony may change at a slightly slower pace. And it is these changes that usually draws our attention. But in the Cistern, there may only be one or two notes every 6-10 seconds, but the change is constant.

For those of you that haven’t heard of Os Mutantes, they are a psychedelic group from 1960s Brazil. They grab influence from ‘Sgt. Pepper’,’Electric Ladyland’,  ‘Pet Sounds’, Bossa Nova and Latin Jazz. If you haven’t heard (or seen) them, do a quick search on YouTube and enjoy a couple songs. And I highly recommend their compilation ‘Anything Is Possible’ on David Byrne’s Luaka Bop label. ‘Fuga No. 11’ is my particular favorite.

Day 9. Miles Davis.

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

I finished up the Bach box late last night and picked up with Mira’s next box set choice, the complete Miles Davis Bitchess Brew sessions. ‘Miles Runs The Voodoo Down”… what an amazing track (and title)! ‘John McLaughlin’… really, some amazing music on this album. Miles described ‘Bitches Brew’ as rock music for black people. And ‘Bitches Brew’ does rock. As Miles’ career takes his music through rock, funk and towards the covering of Cyndi Lauper songs, he was a major innovator and risk taker. His genius let him jump into these areas, and he did it while finding the best young musicians around him.

And as much as I love this album, there is so much about what follows in jazz history that I negatively link to it. While rock music is brought into jazz, it also opened the floodgates to where way too many others decide they can simply do the same thing and be ‘innovative’. What we are left with now is a large number of ‘jazz’ musicians today that simply play rock (soft rock, pop, elevator music) without vocals and claim that they belong to the lineage that was established  by Louis Armstrong, Charlie Parker, Thelonious Monk and John Coltrane.

I can never express how difficult it was for me to shelve Kenny G next to Red Garland, or the Yellowjackets ANYWHERE near Cannonball Adderley. Now – I don’t blame Miles Davis for the creation of smooth / bad jazz. It would have happened no matter what. But when you talk about the revolution that ‘Bitches Brew’ brought to jazz – how it led to Fusion, etc. – well, that’s a road that I wish Miles wasn’t associated with. ‘Bitches Brew’ may be ‘fusion’ but it certainly isn’t Fusion. It’s rough and edgy and gets a lot of energy from the influences brought in and the performances it creates. But it isn’t simply pop music with an instrumental melody. And this is what I feel most contemporary ‘jazz’ has become. Just adult contemporary bland trash.

I’m not saying that jazz is dead or that there isn’t innovation anymore. There certainly is. You have to look for it (and I don’t necessarily think that is a bad thing). Word of mouth really is how you find the best music out there. For those in the Seattle area, check out Cuong Vu, Evan Flory-Barnes, Sunship and the Tom Baker Quartet. Check out the recordings of  The Splatter Trio and Kip Hanrahan. Check out William Parker. Get to a Cecil Taylor show while you still can. These artists are all finding ways to expand the genre in interesting ways and the are bringing in wide and diverse influences. See how these groups and players connect to ‘Bitches Brew’, and see if that helps you get the 70s turn toward bad jazz taste out of your mouth.

Day 8. J.S. Bach.

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010


Mira’s gravitation towards box sets continues, and today’s picks had to be pared down. She chose both the complete J.S. Bach organ works (17 discs) and the Miles Davis ‘Bitch’s Brew’ box set. Celia chose more Queen and Lou Reed… but due to the size of the Bach box I decided to put Miles, Queen and Lou Reed off until tomorrow.

The Bach set is one of two complete Bach organ works I have. The one from today is Peter Hurford’s London set. The different sets of compositions are also performed on organs throughout Europe. So in addition to hearing all of Bach’s organ works, you also get a great sense of how varied an instrument the organ can be. Organs are pretty unique instrument-wise. In some ways, they are like time-capsules. We know about how tuning has changed throughout history (since the pipes don’t easily go in and out of tune, unlike piano strings). It’s history goes back to the 3rd century B.C., and we can see in it’s key layout and construction how the concepts of scale and music theory evolved. It can be orchestrated, and a major part of the organist’s art is the control of registration. Yet, unlike a piano there is little control over dynamics. More stops will make things louder. More notes will make things louder. The swell box can make things louder. Hitting the keys harder – nothing. So when composing for the instrument the number of notes sounding can be an expressive as well as a textural consideration, and the organist can play with a touch that is most comfortable to them without worrying about how it will effect the dynamics of a performance.

During my time at UC Berkeley, I was lucky enough to have a class on Bach with Prof. John Butt, a wonderful teacher and organist. Watching him play was astonishing. His feet played as frantically as his hands did across multiple keyboards. As he came to new themes or sections in a piece, he would also change the stop configuration – the color and power of the instrument would change greatly just by pulling out a couple knobs. In Hertz Hall there were three organs (including a 17th century (?) Italian organ that sat right behind the double bass section on stage during orchestra rehearsals and concerts) and Prof. Butt’s favorite was situated above and behind the audience, which brings up another peculiarity of the instrument. While pianos rarely travel with a performer, concert organs NEVER do. An organist needs to learn the idiosyncrasies of each new instrument they come across for every performance. And you rarely get to SEE the performance. Organ lofts in churches weren’t designed so you could see the organ being played. They were often tucked away – and sometimes the organist might not even be able to hear the instrument well!

So to get a set like the Peter Hurford one is interesting on multiple levels. You get a tour of organs while also getting a tour of one of this instrument’s most amazing composers. I haven’t listened to this set for quite some time, and it is getting a little too late here to turn the volume to where it belongs. But I’m sure I’ll have more to say about these discs tomorrow after having some time to listen to it.

Day 7. Muddy Waters and Schubert.

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

I forgot to get the girls downstairs tonight before they went to bed, so I closed my eyes and picked today’s rips. Two from blues legend Muddy Waters and Wilhem Kempff’s Schubert Sonata box set.

The first of the Muddy Waters discs is a set of field recordings that were captured in Mississippi in the 1940s. They sound quite a bit like most of the most of the other excellent Alan Lomax recordings that were done as part of a large Library of Congress recordings put into motion by Roosevelt’s public works projects that were contained in the New Deal. When the recordings were made, Muddy Waters (in his mid-20s) was living in a cabin on a plantation. There are interviews between him and Lomax on the disc as well, and I am stunned by how well these recordings capture a sense of what it must have meant to be a country blues musician in Mississippi during the great depression. When Lomax asks: “How did you learn to play with a bottle” Muddy Waters says “I found it on the ground and I picked it up”. They talk some more then Lomax asks him to play another song and they record it. Most of these are solo recordings, though a couple feature a second person. A couple of years later Muddy Waters would move to Chicago, and within a few more years he would become a very successful blues musician. By the time the recordings for “Folk Singer” were done in Chicago in the early 60s, Muddy Waters has a full band and much more then a portable recorder at his disposal. He has a full band and a full studio. You can also tell how much better Muddy Waters had been able to eat from comparing the pictures contained in both discs.

But between both, Muddy Waters still plays and sings like a traditional blues singer. His music was influencing rock singers in the US and UK by this time, and in return he was able to make a living in Chicago and record his music in a studio (so – in a way the music industry that he was influencing was also effecting how he worked!). And while the recordings in Chicago are made by a much more established and comfortable musician, the feeling is still all there. He is the older version of that amazing musician that Alan Lomax caught in the fields of Mississippi. There is change that has occurred, but the ‘Folk Singer’ recordings feel like as much of a document as the field recordings do. The first ‘Ooooh!’ in ‘My Captain’ has the echo of the music in the Lomax recordings. But it is an echo, and you get the sense that what has changed is that the 1960s Muddy Waters remembers his roots as well as the hard work that found him success making a living as a musician in Chicago.

The Schubert box is one that I purchased mostly because of how much I love Kempff’s Beethoven playing. I wasn’t familiar with Schubert’s sonatas when I bought it and had no idea what I was in for the first time I listened to 21 minute first movement to the B-flat sonata. This is huge, expansive and lyrical music. At first it seems to hold such a direct relation to Beethoven, but as the music expands Schubert’s gifts for lyricism become more and more apparent. When I played piano more, I always had a great amount of difficulty in handling the dense textures that Schubert often uses in his accompaniments. Large block chords that are repeated under the melody. To me they always seemed to be a mistake, as though they were actually supposed to be scored for strings (partly because it is a texture that Schubert uses so much in his string quartets as well!). But hearing Kempff play them, there is almost no attack – no repetition. Just swells and decrescendos of pulse and texture. He is able to pull them back like curtains to reveal a counter-melody, then let them fall and obscure again. His touch is amazingly nuanced with these gestures, and after I heard him play these pieces, I felt like I knew what I had to work towards.

I have never been happy with how I play Schubert as a result. And I remember thinking that it must just be something about the recording. How could anyone actually play these block chords so smoothly? But I’ve heard other pianists play this music since (both live and on other recordings), and I am constantly amazed at the effect. How can someone can strike the strings so softly, even when playing loudly? While I feel comfortable playing Bach and even some Beethoven and Chopin, I wonder if I’ll ever be able to figure out the touch that is needed to really play Schubert well.

Day 6. U2, Ravel and Mozart.

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Tonight’s picks come from the middle of the U2 stack, a not-so-complete Ravel complete piano music and a VERY complete set of Mozart piano music (Ingrid Haebler’s on Philips).

So first of all, has anyone seen disc 2 of my Angela Hewitt complete Ravel piano set? How many more discs will I open up to find missing? I’ve always felt like I am very careful with my discs, but what does this mean if on Day 6 I am already down a disc???

I have been quite the Ravel enthusiast since I started composing. His later work has such a clarity and elegance to it. So even though I already had a couple of complete sets of his piano work, when Angela Hewitt released her recordings I was quite excited. I love her Bach recordings, and I expected the same kind of care would be apparent with her Ravel recordings. And for the most part it is there. Her “Le Tombeau de Couperin” is beautifully done and ‘Jeux d’eau’ is shimmery. The recordings themselves though seem a little flat compared to the Pascal Roge discs. As with most recent rock recordings, I think there is a bit of compression in the recordings, and as a result they aren’t as dynamic and nuanced as the Roge discs.

‘War’, ‘Under a Blood Red Sky’ and ‘The Joshua Tree’ were the three U2 discs, and I have to say that one of my bigger disappointments in U2 is that in my mind they are one of the bands most responsible for the loss of dynamics in rock recordings. As digital recording became more and more common, U2 was one of the bands that led the way in exploring how best to take advantage of the format. The change in production quality between ‘The Joshua Tree’ and ‘Achtung Baby’ is pretty amazing, but by the time you get to ‘All That You Can’t Leave Behind’ I feel like you aren’t hearing much of the band anymore. It doesn’t matter if they play soft for a couple notes, it will all get cancelled out in the production. And the sound of the instruments is drowned in effects.

Not so with these three albums though. I had a great conversation with my friend Izzy at Origin 23 here in Tacoma a couple weeks ago after I heard ‘Seconds’ follow up ‘Sunday, Bloody Sunday’ on the sound system. I love it when someone plays an entire album and ‘War’ is a great entire album to play. I mentioned how much I loved hearing ‘Seconds’ (which I think is the best song on the album) and Izzy and I immediately started talking about how great a drummer Larry Mullen is. And ‘War’ just may be his peak in my opinion. While I think the song writing on ‘Joshua Tree’ and ‘Achtung Baby’ is better, the feel of ‘War’ has a cool drive to it. Edge’s playing is great, Bono doesn’t feel like he has started to pull ahead of the rest of the band yet (well, he always seemed to put himself ahead of everyone, but this gets to be much worse later) and Adam Clayton’s playing drives just as strongly as Larry Mullen Jr’s drums.

Tamiko and I saw U2 during the Zoo TV tour (supporting ‘Achtung Baby’ but before ‘Zooropa’ came out). Even with a very sick Bono taking the stage, HUGE screens of TVs and cars hung overhead to use as stage lights, they put on an amazing show. And I remember that hearing them live without the benefit of studio production made the songs from ‘Achtung Baby’ sound so much better. While the tour was promoted as an ‘out with the old in with the new’ kind of deal, the second half of the show had a few older songs as well as a cover of ABBA’s ‘Dancing Queen’.

Or maybe it was being at a concert with Tamiko (one of our first concerts together). I especially remember holding her close while they played ‘All I Want Is You’. ‘With or Without You’ was an encore. The concert did sound good, but the date was even better.

Day 5. Rubinstein playing Chopin, Queen and Beethoven.

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

I first heard most of Chopin’s music with the performances of Arthur Rubinstein (released by BMG). These recordings are quite possibly the standard for Chopin’s music, 90% of which is for solo piano. This box set (11 CDs total) also includes both of Chopin’s concertos but a number of works are missing. This set doesn’t pretend in any way to be a ‘complete’ Chopin (some notable solo pieces are missing – especially the etudes), but if you are going to grab a strong representation of Chopin’s work it would be hard to find a better choice then this one.

Idil Birit also did an excellent set of recordings of Chopin’s work on Naxos. She is a wonderful pianist and the recordings are very well done. But one drawback to that box is the feeling that there was a time table set to get the complete Chopin piano works compiled, and as a result there is an unevenness in the performances. None are bad… and her sense of tempo and the all important ‘Chopin rubato; is certainly there, but there are a number of pieces that feel like she isn’t as familiar with them. And while there are many advantages to grabbing all of something in a single box, with only a few exceptions do I really think it is a good idea – especially if that box is part of a ‘project’. One of the things that I think makes the Rubinstein box stand out so well is that it is compiled from recordings that span over two decades. So what you get are recordings that capture not only a huge amount of Chopin’s music, but a significant chunk of Rubinstein’s career. You don’t get a sense with these performances that anything is filler, or being performed to satisfy a completist goal. They all sound quite personal. And though it could be argued that there are probably better recordings of the Nocturnes (for example – I once had a great argument about the Rubinstein vs. the Ashkenazy recordings) I think it would be hard to say that there are any other recordings that feel like you have a performer and composer so close to each other. And you as the listener is brought in close as well. I could probably go into the Romantic notions about why so much of Chopin’s music is written for solo piano, but I would rather just say that this music really is made for a small audience. On a concert stage they seem out of place. But in the studio space where these were mostly recorded, a sense of intimacy is captured that many recital or modern recordings seem to miss. I wouldn’t say they feel like Rubinstein is here in the room with me, but I feel like these are recordings that capture a sense of small space. And that is how I like to hear Chopin played.

So from the small space to the stadium – ‘The Queen’s Jewels’ is a blue velvet box set containing Queen’s first 8 albums (basically all the albums from the 70s). This of course includes Wayne and Garth’s favorite and the theme song to the Met’s 1986 World Series victory. Of the later – whenever I hear ‘We Will Rock You’ start, I generally can’t wait to get through the first 1:15 or so of the song. I can understand how the drums, hand claps and group of voices yelling ‘We Will, We Will Rock YOU!’ can get a stadium full of people pumped up, but it is the slow swell of Brain May’s guitar that makes this song for me. What an amazing guitarist, with an amazing guitar sound. And it is when he finally cuts off the singing with that amazing solo that the song FINALLY does start to rock.

Queen has been one of those bands that has never been at the forefront of my musical tastes. I think they are great, and there is even a nod to ‘Killer Queen’ in one of my pieces. But I rarely think ‘I’m in the mood for listening to Queen’. But then they come on and I have a great time, only to repeat the cycle. But I have seen the fanaticism they can inspire. When I was 16 and first working at Tower Records, one of my fellow employees (Thad) was one of the first people I had to ever really spend time with and I didn’t get along with. The guy was an ass… abrasive, rude and … well, mostly filled with hate. I heard Ministry for the first time because Thad was playing it and I think this was generally on the timid side for him. Anyways, the day Freddie Mercury dies I come into work, and Queen is playing VERY loudly in the store. And there is Thad behind the counter, tears streaming down from behind his black sunglasses onto his black leather vest. On the dry-erase board behind the counter is a red and black dry-erase homage to Freddie. And the second I walk in, he just storms into the back room, leaving me to run the record store solo for the next few hours. This guy has never shown an emotion in the three months I had worked there except contempt, and now here he was bawling his eyes out and needing cover. ‘Who Wants To Live Forever’ had been on repeat.

This was my first time ever having the record store to myself.

While Thad had opened ‘A Kind of Magic’ just for that song, I remember continuing the tribute by digging out three British import discs we had (that mostly became the Classic Queen CD here in the US). While ‘Who Wants To Live Forever’ is a beautiful song, I had a feeling that Freddie would probably rather have everyone in the store listening to ‘Bicycle Race’. Whether Freddie did or not, it was certainly what I preferred hearing that day.

The next day, Thad thanked me for covering. It was one of the only times he would ever actually say something directly to me.afterwards he went on being his regular ass self. But quite often when I hear Queen, I think about that scene.

The last set of discs I ripped tonight are David Zinman’s Beethoven Symphonies. For those who keep track of these types of things, these were the first modern instrument recordings of the New Barenreiter Edition. John Eliot Gardiner had recorded these editions on period instruments about five years earlier, and in general both of those sets are lots of fun to listen to. Though when it comes to Beethoven’s symphonies, I still go back to the 1963 Karajan recordings more then any others.

more connections…

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

now the laptop that is managing all the conversion / storage is hooked up to the stereo in our basement! And using the ‘Screen Sharing’ function in Mac OS X, I can control that computer from my laptop. The sound is pretty good (1/8 headphone jack to RCA inputs on the amplifier), but a little dull. It will work for now, and my laptop is basically a remote control to the computer.